Re: F21 Self Contained Change: Playground repository

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 04/08/2014 03:04 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Adding repos definitely should not be taken lightly.  Frankly, if
>> 2 is really something worth doing, then perhaps also the
>> (overly?) stringent policies need rethinking.
>> 
>> I freely admit there's definitely some gray area here, and maybe
>> another repo is indeed the right (ie, least-bad) approach.
> 
> This type of gray area is what RPMFusion covers.
> 
> Chromium should be in the "free" repository, but it appears no one
> has taken the initiative to do so. Why do we need a third
> repository for Chromium?

RPMFusion maintains the same restrictions on bundling that Fedora has.
Chromium would be unacceptable there as well.

RPMFusion allows shipping of packages that are unacceptable for legal
reasons in Fedora (usually patents with insufficient licensing).
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/

iEYEARECAAYFAlNEWxAACgkQeiVVYja6o6OyrACfSHIDAbay17kRJ5g8aXIT8C2s
wysAn0rIGil9DqLlshPPhcJO7kW+gbND
=yE/d
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct





[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux