Re: RFC: Simply the retirement procedure - trigger on dead.package

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 07:46:28PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 12:35:13PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 19:21:53 +0100,
> >   Till Maas <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > >
> > >What are your opinions about this? I already checked with Dennis
> > >Gilmore, he is ok with this.
> > 
> > Is there a fail against doing this in released versions? (Unless
> > there is a legal reason to do the retirement, we wouldn't want to do
> > that for a package in a release.)
> 
> It will be done only for Rawhide and Branched (until the Final Change
> Deadline) and maybe EPEL if desired. Wether or not to e.g. retire
> packages for other releases without blocking them in Koji needs to be
> decided.
> 
> Regards
> Till

Sounds like a good idea to me.  Also seems like it is important enough
to run inside the infrastructure environment so that it can be
monitored.

The #fedora-apps team has been working on pkgdb2 which the authors
hope to deploy shortly after the F20 release.  Restricting retirement
rights to the automated process shouldn't be a problem.

Attachment: pgpwvG758bmPp.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux