Re: F18 DNF and history

[Nikola Pajkovsky <npajkovs@xxxxxxxxxx>]

Angus Salkeld <asalkeld@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On 19/06/12 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
>>> On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>>> > Hi,
>>> >
>>> > I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
>>> >
>>> > Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future?
>>> >
>>> > According to what is written here
>>> > https://github.com/akozumpl/dnf/wiki/Features-Considered-for-Dropping
>>> > history function will likely be dropped.
>>> >
>>> >  From my POV history feature is very useful. Is there a plan to provide
>>> > history function in Fedora dnf if yum gets dropped?
>>> >
>>>
>>> Hi Michal,
>>>
>>> Thanks for pointing this out. I considered history a candidate for
>>> dropping because I didn't realize people had usecases for it. It is not
>>> present in the early versions of DNF but I will make sure to put it back
>>> in later.
>>
>>Just to add my voice to the choir, I use it extensively and I suspect
>>many others in QA group too. It's extremely useful when trying to
>>determine exactly what update caused a given problem.
>
> Maybe a "yum history bisect" would be a neat feature?

nice one, sir

-- 
Nikola
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel