Re: *countable infinities only |
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
- To: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: *countable infinities only
- From: Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2012 15:53:38 +0200
- Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <jr28n1$g9a$1@dough.gmane.org>
- Openpgp: id=7F780279; url=http://arrakis.thelounge.net/gpg/h.reindl_thelounge.net.pub.txt
- Organization: the lounge interactive design
- Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120605 Thunderbird/13.0
Am 10.06.2012 15:50, schrieb Ben Boeckel:
> On Sat, Jun 09, 2012 at 06:15:03 GMT, Chris Smart wrote:
>> Will requiring users to turn off secure boot really by such a big deal I
>> wonder?
>
> What if disabling SB or modifying the keys is largely classified as
> "breaking warranty" by manufacturers? I don't remember anything from the
> logo requirements that would forbid it.
which law in which country would support this?
even if it would be legally ok: do not buy crap if you want
use a free operating system - there will always be business
machines supporting linux and they are mostly even cheaper
as the "consumer-crap"
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Fedora Announce]
[Fedora Kernel]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Home]
[Fedora Tools]
[Fedora PHP Devel]
[Kernel List]
[Fedora Legacy]
[Fedora Maintainers]
[Fedora Maintainers]
[Fedora Desktop]
[PAM]
[Red Hat Development]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]