Re: Update ImageMagick in Fedora 16 |
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Pavel,
On Tue, 2012-05-29 at 20:21 +0400, Pavel Alexeev wrote:
> It is main reason why I request provenpackager rights. In fedora 17 it
> was so painful because I several times asks build dependencies and
> then ask help to push updates too.
> I think in that turn now I can do all that myself, so it should be
> smoother.
>
> As there around 6 security issues, I think update upstream release is
> easiest, and furthermore robust way handle it.
I've seen you didn't listen to Tomáš's or Kalev's advice on not bumping
the ImageMagick's soname in a stable release.
Furthermore, you didn't give any warning to the maintainers of the
dependent packages (except for the message on this list).
In my opinion, being a provenpackager is no excuse for not doing that.
Please, use the packagename-owner@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx addresses to send
out emails to the appropriate package maintainers.
For techne (one of the dependent packages which I maintain) you bumped
the release from 0.2.3-2 to 0.2.3-3, which breaks upgrades to F-17 and
rawhide.
Is there a way to revert the change and make a 0.2.3-2.fc16.1 build?
Best regards,
Tadej Janež
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Fedora Announce]
[Fedora Kernel]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Home]
[Fedora Tools]
[Fedora PHP Devel]
[Kernel List]
[Fedora Legacy]
[Fedora Maintainers]
[Fedora Maintainers]
[Fedora Desktop]
[PAM]
[Red Hat Development]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]