Re: Logwatch - looking for testers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Logwatch - looking for testers
From: Richard Vickery <richard.vickeryrv@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 5 May 2012 20:36:31 -0700
Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <053ea433-e39a-4040-8ec8-f5e2ee58ce80@zmail12.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Hi Jan:

I just ran this; what qualifies as an "unmatched entry"? How am I to spot one?

Richard

On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Reindl Harald wrote:
> i do not speak about pushig them to updates-testing or even stable
> i speak about "give me a koji-build which i can test"

Making the fix apply to the stable release often requires additional
backporting effort.

Michal

--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Logwatch - looking for testers
  - From: Richard Vickery

References:
- Re: Logwatch - looking for testers
  - From: Reindl Harald
- Re: Logwatch - looking for testers
  - From: Michal Schmidt

Prev by Date: Re: EPEL 6 cmake RPATH deafults?!?
Next by Date: Re: Logwatch - looking for testers
Previous by thread: Re: Logwatch - looking for testers
Next by thread: Re: Logwatch - looking for testers
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Home] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel List] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]

Add to Google

Powered by Linux