Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17 |
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 11:22 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 26.04.2012 11:18, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> >> Does that imply that new installs will be easily switched from firewalld
> >> to static iptables? I always do new install but I want to keep my firewall
> >> static, with my current iptables script.
> >
> > Once we actually go to firewalld by default, then yes, at least as long
> > as lokkit and s-c-f are maintained
>
> the machines where iptables.service is needed do not have
> any GUI installed and so "system-config-firewall" does not
> matter
There's a TUI version of it too, still.
> the really important things are only "iptables.service" and
> "/etc/sysconfig/iptables-config", the rest is done with
> shellscripts
Yeah, you can always do it that way too.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
[Fedora Announce]
[Fedora Kernel]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Home]
[Fedora Tools]
[Fedora PHP Devel]
[Kernel List]
[Fedora Legacy]
[Fedora Maintainers]
[Fedora Maintainers]
[Fedora Desktop]
[PAM]
[Red Hat Development]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]