Re: firewalld / iptables.service past F17

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 11:22 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
> 
> Am 26.04.2012 11:18, schrieb Adam Williamson:
> >> Does that imply that new installs will be easily switched from firewalld
> >> to static iptables? I always do new install but I want to keep my firewall
> >> static, with my current iptables script.
> > 
> > Once we actually go to firewalld by default, then yes, at least as long
> > as lokkit and s-c-f are maintained
> 
> the machines where iptables.service is needed do not have
> any GUI installed and so "system-config-firewall" does not
> matter

There's a TUI version of it too, still.

> the really important things are only "iptables.service" and
> "/etc/sysconfig/iptables-config", the rest is done with
> shellscripts

Yeah, you can always do it that way too.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Home]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel List]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

Add to Google Powered by Linux