Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 08:29:59PM +0000, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 04/23/2012 07:45 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >We shouldn't be promoting anything to primary arch that you can't install.
> Valid point but it still does not explain why FESCo chose to limit
> that exclusively to Anaconda and the "Installer team" and their
> installation methods or lack there of.

ARM is moving into the server and laptop space. There's an expectation 
that devices of that nature can be installed using Anaconda. If a port 
is only supporting embedded devices where Anaconda makes no sense then 
that's fine, but if it's supporting other hardware classes then it needs 
to have a working Anaconda. I've no idea why this is controversial.

Matthew Garrett | mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
devel mailing list

[Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Home]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel List]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

Add to Google Powered by Linux