Re: F17, firewalld, avahi |
|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
On Apr 19, 2012, at 12:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> I think that should be seriously considered. Like Chris, I'm not
> terribly comfortable with the idea of shipping a default firewall that
> has no graphical configuration tool, and a command line one which will
> be entirely unfamiliar to people. It seems like a recipe for pain. I
> also agree with Chris that if we're going to do it, we should do it
> *now*, not wait until we're halfway through validation.
>
> Could we bung this on the agenda for the next FESCo meeting?
Network Zones would appear to be a casualty of reversion.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/network-zones
Chris Murphy
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
- References:
- F17, firewalld, avahi
- Re: F17, firewalld, avahi
- Re: F17, firewalld, avahi
- Re: F17, firewalld, avahi
- Re: F17, firewalld, avahi
- Re: F17, firewalld, avahi
- Re: F17, firewalld, avahi
- Re: F17, firewalld, avahi
- Re: F17, firewalld, avahi
- Re: F17, firewalld, avahi
- Re: F17, firewalld, avahi
- Re: F17, firewalld, avahi
[Fedora Announce]
[Fedora Kernel]
[Fedora Testing]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Home]
[Fedora Tools]
[Fedora PHP Devel]
[Kernel List]
[Fedora Legacy]
[Fedora Maintainers]
[Fedora Maintainers]
[Fedora Desktop]
[PAM]
[Red Hat Development]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]