Re: Fwd: Broken upgrade path(s) detected for: yaml-cpp

[Sergio Belkin <sebelk@xxxxxxxxx>]

2012/4/18 Mark Wielaard <mjw@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, 2012-04-17 at 13:41 -0400, Neil Horman wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 12:24:18PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> > Is something wrong? I just re-checked the updates I pushed and I did
>> > push updates of the same EVR to both F15 and F16...
>> >
>> +1, I think something is wrong with the reporting tool.  I just got upgrade
>> broken emails for all of my packages, and they all appear to be ok from what I
>> can see.  Looks like the reporting tool is pulling the wrong nvr's for packages
>> in the f16 repo.
>> >
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From:  <buildsys@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> I tried to reply/report the issue to the buildsys but that address
> bounces. Could the script be fixed to use an address that works?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mark

I've received a mail about broken upgrade path of UpTools package too.

UpTools has the same EVR to both F15 and F16 too.

So was it a bug of check-upgrade-paths.py isn't it?

How often is run that test?

Today I've followed instructions from
http://jlaska.wordpress.com/2010/06/01/fedora-package-maintainers-want-test-results/
is that right?

I've run:

autoqa-optin UpTools F-15

Tell me if I'm wrong

TIA
-- 
--
Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com
Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com
LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel