Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:10:12PM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>> > All supported platforms must have kernels built from the Fedora
>> > kernel SRPM and enabled by default in the spec file. Each kernel must
>> > be built in a timely manner for every SRPM upload.
>>
>> What exactly is timely?  What margin is acceptable?  Is this only
>> for kernel or does this apply to any package with a
>> much-longer-than-average build time?  What would constitute being in
>> that class?  Or should the class be critical-path packages?
>> Something else?
>
> The kernel's kind of a special case due to the relatively frequent
> security updates. The exact nature of what kind of speed is required
> would probably need to be discussed with the kernel team.

It was, on the kernel list:

https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/kernel/2012-March/003702.html

(Max build time for the kernel: 4 hours).

josh
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Home]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel List]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

Add to Google Powered by Linux