Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:29 PM, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On 4/4/12 11:28 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> Ok, giving money won't work, and the tax stuff is a mess.  Let's
>> ignore that for a second.
>> What about equipment?
>> Consider: if a box showed up at PHX, which contained hardware that met
>> the technology requirements of PHX, with a note that said "here,
>> yours, no strings attached" - what would happen?  Would it be
>> returned, or used?
> Used.  There is a process for donating hardware in place, and it's been used
> before.

To be clear, it would be used but ownership still resides with whomever
purchased the hardware.  At least as far as I know.  So really, it's
more akin to PHX hosting your hardware for use than it is an outright
donation.  Think of it as an indefinite loan, where you don't pay for
colo space/power.

devel mailing list

[Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Home]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel List]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

Add to Google Powered by Linux