Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft
From: DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Apr 2012 14:28:03 -0400
Delivered-to: devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <CA+0bQbFfUWE0zSHQ-A3koiZEkmAm23-mbEzU2xb7GtiQ0aS_JA@mail.gmail.com> (jsmith@fedoraproject.org)
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

Ok, giving money won't work, and the tax stuff is a mess.  Let's
ignore that for a second.

What about equipment?

Consider: if a box showed up at PHX, which contained hardware that met
the technology requirements of PHX, with a note that said "here,
yours, no strings attached" - what would happen?  Would it be
returned, or used?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft
  - From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft
  - From: Jesse Keating

References:
- Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft
  - From: Brendan Conoboy
- Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft
  - From: Josh Boyer
- Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft
  - From: Peter Robinson
- Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft
  - From: Peter Jones
- Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft
  - From: Josh Boyer
- Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft
  - From: Brendan Conoboy
- Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft
  - From: Dennis Gilmore
- Re: Feedback on secondary architecute promotion requirements draft
  - From: Josh Boyer
- Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft
  - From: Dennis Gilmore
- Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft
  - From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft
  - From: Josh Boyer
- Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft
  - From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft
  - From: Jesse Keating
- Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft
  - From: Stephen John Smoogen
- Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft
  - From: "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson"
- Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft
  - From: Jared K. Smith

Prev by Date: Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft
Next by Date: Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft
Previous by thread: Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft
Next by thread: Re: Feedback on secondary architecture promotion requirements draft
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Home] [Fedora Tools] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel List] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]