ARM as a primary architecture

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Jon, Brendan,

In yesterday's FESCo meeting I told you I'd make a list of specific issues
I have with the current proposal for ARM as a primary archictecture. There
are some places where I think the current proposal fails to deal with some
necessary aspects of becoming a primary architecture, and some places where
I don't think the approach is quite right.  So without further ado:

1) mechanisms need to be in place to get package maintainers access to fix
   arm-specific bugs in their packages
2) excludearch is not an option.  This is fundamentally contrary to being
   a primary arch. In fact this is one of the defining characteristics of
   a secondary arch.
3) arm must be integrated to the formal release criteria
4) when milestones occur, arm needs to be just as testible as other
   primary architectures
5) installation methods must be in place.  I'm not saying it has to be
   using the same model as x86, but when we get to beta, if it can't be
   installed, it can't meet similar release criteria to existing or prior
   primary arches. Where possible, we should be using anaconda for
   installation, though I'd be open to looking at using it to build installed
   images for machines with severe resource constraints.
6) supported platforms must be fully integrated into building and
   installation.  If you need a special build procedure to make this happen
   for kernel, we need to have rel-eng signing off saying they've approved
   of whatever method that is, and QE signing off that they think it'll
   result in a something they can claim is tested enough to release as a
   primary arch.
7) it can't be a serious maintenance burdon due to build related issues.
   We need a couple of groups to sign off that builds are fast enough, not
   just on a "full distro rebuild" (throughput) level, but also on a
   "doesn't destroy my workflow due to waiting on it" (latency) level.

Obviously any feedback you guys have on this is welcome.


--
        Peter

Old MacDonald had an agricultural real-estate tax abatement.

01234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789012345678901234567890123456789
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



[Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Home]     [Fedora Tools]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel List]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

Add to Google Powered by Linux