Re: Underlying DE for the Workstation product

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]



On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 18:28 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 21:25 -0500, Alexander GS wrote:
> 
> > That's why I propose the following:
> > 
> > Proposal: GNOME Foundation adopts GNOME 2 (MATE) as an official GNOME
> > desktop alongside GNOME 3 (GNOME Shell).
> 
> You appear to be confused. This is the Fedora desktop mailing list. It
> is not the GNOME Foundation mailing list.
> -- 
> Adam Williamson
> Fedora QA Community Monkey
> IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
> http://www.happyassassin.net
> 

I was addressing Michael's comments and replying directly.  Perhaps this
is the wrong mailing list I'll make sure to post this to the Gnome
Desktop list as well.  Thanks for letting me know.

> Anyway, it sounds like you're spot-on part of the target audience for
> GNOME Classic. I'm sure the developers would be interested in feedback
> on why that environment doesn't currently meet your needs, and how it
> might be improved to do so.



-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop





[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora KDE]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux