On Thu, 2012-02-02 at 12:29 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> "Renamed"? If so, it would be just another example why our Package
> Renaming Process is flawed and only adds tiresome bureaucracy for
> those who follow it.
Hi,
I'm sorry for a confusion, it wasn't meant like real "rename of a
package", I did not know internals for the change, for me it was
"renamed", but as Matthias explained, it was not a package rename.
Bye,
Milan
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
[Fedora Users]
[Fedora Announce]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Kernel]
[Fedora Legacy]
[Fedora Docs]
[Fedora Config]
[PAM]
[Red Hat Development]
[Red Hat 9]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
