- Subject: Re: Proposal: Too similar application names
- From: Bastien Nocera <bnocera@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2011 18:21:06 +0100
- Delivered-to: desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- In-reply-to: <1308848367.1868.17.camel@adam>
- Organization: Red Hat
On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 09:59 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 11:50 -0400, Vitezslav Humpa wrote:
>
> > Gnome(and KDE), perhaps with some exceptions, seem to cover s-c-*
> > options rather well. I think we should consider simply removing the
> > conflicting s-c-* from the menus altogether, thus getting rid of the
> > duplicity. Should the user need to access these particular s-c-*
> > utilities, they will still be present in the system.
> >
> > These are the ones, that are duplicate to the gnome-control-panel tools:
> > system-config-date (Date & Time vs. Date and Time)
> > system-config-printer (Printing vs. Printers)
> > system-config-users (Users and Groups vs. User Accounts)
> >
> > Thoughts?
>
> Need to check that the GNOME / KDE tools can set these things
> system-wide (usually done via PolicyKit integration I think), but in
> principle, yes. Well, rather than remove them from the menus, we could
> make them NotShowIn (or whatever the keyword is) GNOME and KDE.
> Desktop / KDE teams, wdyt?
I would really rather they weren't installed at all, but that would do
fine in the meanwhile.
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
[Fedora Users]
[Fedora Announce]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Kernel]
[Fedora Legacy]
[Fedora Docs]
[Fedora Config]
[PAM]
[Red Hat Development]
[Red Hat 9]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]