On Thu, 2011-04-28 at 18:15 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 04:13:30PM -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> > +# repoquery --whatrequires libpanel-applet-2.so.0 gnome-python2-applet
> > +# as of Fedora 15 20110428
> > +Obsoletes: gnome-python2-applet
> > +Obsoletes: file-browser-applet
> > +Obsoletes: glunarclock
> > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-bubblemon
> > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-cpufire
> > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-globalmenu
> > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-grandr
> > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-music
> > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-sensors
> > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-window-picker
> > +Obsoletes: gnome-applets
> > +Obsoletes: gnome-netstatus
> > +Obsoletes: gnome-python2-applet
> > +Obsoletes: gnubiff
> > +Obsoletes: lock-keys-applet
> > +Obsoletes: uim-gnome
> > +Obsoletes: deskbar-applet
> > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-jalali-calendar
> > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-music
> > +Obsoletes: gnome-applet-timer
> > +Obsoletes: gnome-applets
> > +Obsoletes: gnome-schedule
> > +Obsoletes: hamster-applet
> > +Obsoletes: x-tile
>
> Shouldn't these Obsoletes: be versioned just in case someone wants to
> introduce a newer version of a package with the same name later?
+1, obsoletes should *always* be versioned.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
[Fedora Users]
[Fedora Announce]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Kernel]
[Fedora Legacy]
[Fedora Docs]
[Fedora Config]
[PAM]
[Red Hat Development]
[Red Hat 9]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]