Re: tracker bug for failed fallback created

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Well, I mean, I think just about _all_ bugs of this kind are going to be
> hardware-specific somehow.

Unfortunately not, see for example:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642367

I can also imagine missing or superfluous packages being a problem
(remember our upgrade mechanisms are currently defined to by default
not pull in new packages from the OS base, or remove old ones we don't
want).

> The only way that wouldn't be the case is if
> the fallback mechanism were somehow utterly and completely broken in
> implementation; once you've written a fallback mechanism that at least
> theoretically does what it's supposed to do, all bugs are 'corner
> cases', yes?

I'm fine with the non-hardware bugs being individual, I don't think we
need a tracker.  So I'll just retitle and comment in the current one
to make things more clear.  Thanks!
-- 
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop


[Fedora Users]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Docs]     [Fedora Config]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

Add to Google Powered by Linux