On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:32 AM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Well, I mean, I think just about _all_ bugs of this kind are going to be
> hardware-specific somehow.
Unfortunately not, see for example:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=642367
I can also imagine missing or superfluous packages being a problem
(remember our upgrade mechanisms are currently defined to by default
not pull in new packages from the OS base, or remove old ones we don't
want).
> The only way that wouldn't be the case is if
> the fallback mechanism were somehow utterly and completely broken in
> implementation; once you've written a fallback mechanism that at least
> theoretically does what it's supposed to do, all bugs are 'corner
> cases', yes?
I'm fine with the non-hardware bugs being individual, I don't think we
need a tracker. So I'll just retitle and comment in the current one
to make things more clear. Thanks!
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
[Fedora Users]
[Fedora Announce]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Kernel]
[Fedora Legacy]
[Fedora Docs]
[Fedora Config]
[PAM]
[Red Hat Development]
[Red Hat 9]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
