On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:54 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-07-30 at 16:46 +0100, pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 4:34 PM, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> > Hi, folks. Just a question - since GNOME 3 is being delayed and won't
>> > ship in F14, does it make sense to have a few apps (but not many) ported
>> > to GTK+ 3 for F14? I can see it causing more trouble along the lines of
>> > the gnome-python2-desktop package. Would it be better to move them back
>> > to GTK+ 2 and postpone porting to GTK+ 3 until F15? What's the plan in
>> > general for backing off from 2.90.x versions of GNOME bits? Thanks!
>>
>> With the disabling of gnome-python2-evince the sugar team has an issue
>> with our sugar-read package which depends on it.
>
> Yeah, I noticed that, but I didn't see any good option to avoid it; if
> we don't rebuild g-p2-d and disable evince, it won't work *at all*,
> since it'll still be built against py2.6 :/
I can cope in the short term. As long as its fixed eventually before release!
Peter
--
desktop mailing list
desktop@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop
[Fedora Users]
[Fedora Announce]
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Kernel]
[Fedora Legacy]
[Fedora Docs]
[Fedora Config]
[PAM]
[Red Hat Development]
[Red Hat 9]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]