Standard configuration files
- To: fedora-config-list@xxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Standard configuration files
- From: "Pedro Bezunartea López" <pedro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2006 02:02:58 +0200
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:sender:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:x-google-sender-auth; b=UZSEA5q7H3wDNzDsdoL1H/R5VvdNhHRatgyvpLZkptpQdWQ7WZJiW/6K1vHmB+zEnCjhZz5d9kxAMSPZVfJ7eWu7FEbmrsfZ9Gw/8RH96mijhiexEMNGIMVWuySe3M8LutySmFlwqi4Iyex5hAgzn9ILWlMXXjkwK6kzP7qh7uI=
- Reply-to: Discussions about configuration tool development <fedora-config-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Hi!
I've been working with Linux for a few years now and one of the things I like most about it is the possibility of configuring everything by modifying readable text files. This is good but if you need to configure several services you may ask yoursel: why are all the configuration files for all the services so different? couldn't we come out with a standard file format that all services, devices, etc would use? What do you think? Here some ideas to begin with:
1. It'd have to be based in XML-dtd. Two important reasons, first it's a widely used standard, and second it's readable enough... and I can think of another one: it can describe very complex models.
2. There are already some services that use this kind of configuration files: tomcat... there's a place to start.
Any suggestions are welcomed,
Pedro.
--
Fedora-config-list mailing list
Fedora-config-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list
[Fedora Legacy Announce]
[Home]
[Kernel]
[Fedora Legacy]
[Fedora Packaging]
[Fedora Desktop]
[PAM]
[Red Hat Development]
[Red Hat 9 Bible]
[Red Hat 9]
[Big List of Linux Books]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]