[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: Apacheconf HIG



On ÑÑÐ, 2004-09-07 at 13:12 -0400, Paul Nasrat wrote:
> Bugzilla is possibly a better place for that as it doesn't get lost.  In this case discussion around the bug can be focussed here.  Create an RFE - link to the screenshots on a website somewhere and table the discussion.
> 
> > what i'm all talking about :) if that turns out to be ok, i _WILL_
> > improve apacheconf UI, and all other fedora sys tools that use glade,
> > then i can move to those that don't (i'm also a programmer:)
> 
> It'd be helpful for you to share on common issues, etc in addition to posting
> patches/new glade files.  To ensure future development is more HIG aware.  Your
> help/patches are welcome, hopefully we could document some of this up into a
> smaller Fedora s-c-foo HIG gotchas doc or something.
> 
> Paul
> 

	this is current apacheconf http://www.gnome-ppp.org/fedora/apache-
conf.old.png

	this is what i would start doing http://www.gnome-
ppp.org/fedora/apache-conf.hig.png

	first, change all glade ui's to hig compliance, and then we can seat
and talk to make some string more human.

	bye,
	vladeck.

-- 
"There's no room for ideals in this mechanical place. There has to be
passion. "



-- 
Fedora-config-list mailing list
Fedora-config-list@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-config-list

[Fedora Legacy Announce]     [Home]     [Kernel]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Packaging]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Red Hat 9 Bible]     [Red Hat 9]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

Powered by Linux