| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
On Thu, Aug 28, 2008 at 04:45:59PM -0400, Jeremy Katz wrote: > > I don't think that a spin shipped without SELinux is really something > that we want to call Fedora IMHO. So far the trademark guidelines haven't had a use case where we required a package or a feature. While I want to see SELinux retained in the main Fedora release, there may well be a good reason for a Fedora spin or derivative to not include it. Perhaps Spins need specific features retained; are Spins merely different package sets? Fedora derivatives are certainly more than just different package sets. -Matt _______________________________________________ fedora-advisory-board mailing list fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board
[Home] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [KDE Users] [Fedora Tools] [Linux Audio Users]
