Re: non-disclosure of infrastructure problem a management issue?

[Josh Boyer <jwboyer@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, 2008-08-21 at 21:58 +0200, Bjørn Tore Sund wrote:
> Sadly, the same cannot be said about the Management of the Fedora project.
> Their choice of complete non-disclosure is enough to eradicate any and all
> confidence that Fedora is a trustworthy platform for Linux installations.
> What information they have released has been deliberately vague and,
> frankly, useless. For a day or two to secure things this may be a workable
> strategy. For a full week, not giving the community participants any chance
> whatsoever to protect themselves from threats indicated but not specified?
> This is poor management and poor judgement and reflects very badly not only
> on the Fedora project but on Fedora's RedHat sponsor as well. The issue is
> more than serious enough and has gone on for more than long enough that
> someone higher up the scale should have stepped in a long time ago and made
> sure that all relevant info was released to the community.

I'm not entirely sure what you mean by management.  If you mean the
governing bodies of Fedora, I can assure you that FESCo _did_ ask to be
informed and we told they could not be.  I know this because I was the
one that asked.

Whether all of the Fedora Board (the only group higher than FESCo) has
been informed or not, I have no idea.

josh

_______________________________________________
fedora-advisory-board mailing list
fedora-advisory-board@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-advisory-board