|
|
|
Re: [PATCH] [PPC64] Fix wrong max_memory_ranges value | |
| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] | |
On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 03:48:15PM +0100, Bernhard Walle wrote: > The value of max_memory_ranges is calculated in count_memory_ranges() and only > counts the memory@ nodes. However, in get_devtree_details(), pci@ nodes are also > added to exclude_range just at the end of the loop. > > This patch changes count_memory_ranges() to also consider pci@ nodes in > /proc/device-tree. > > Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@xxxxxxx> Thanks, I have applied this to kexec-tools-testing http://www.vergenet.net/linux/kexec/#kexec-tools-testing -- Horms H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/ W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/ _______________________________________________ fastboot mailing list fastboot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot
[Netdev] [Linux Wireless] [Kernel Newbies] [Security] [Linux for Hams] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Yosemite] [Yosemite Forum] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux RAID] [Linux Admin] [Samba] [Linux Media] [Linux Resources]