Re: [PATCH] [PPC64] Fix wrong max_memory_ranges value

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 03:48:15PM +0100, Bernhard Walle wrote:
> The value of max_memory_ranges is calculated in count_memory_ranges() and only
> counts the memory@ nodes. However, in get_devtree_details(), pci@ nodes are also
> added to exclude_range just at the end of the loop.
> 
> This patch changes count_memory_ranges() to also consider pci@ nodes in 
> /proc/device-tree.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Bernhard Walle <bwalle@xxxxxxx>

Thanks, I have applied this to kexec-tools-testing

http://www.vergenet.net/linux/kexec/#kexec-tools-testing

-- 
Horms
  H: http://www.vergenet.net/~horms/
  W: http://www.valinux.co.jp/en/

_______________________________________________
fastboot mailing list
fastboot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot


[Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux