Re: [PATCH 5/5] Move definition of hard_smp_processor_id to asm/smp.h - alpha, m32r, powerpc, s390, sparc, sparc64, um

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


On Thu, 2007-03-01 at 10:03 +0100, Heiko Carstens wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 01, 2007 at 04:18:23PM +0900, Fernando Luis Vázquez Cao wrote:
> > Move definition of hard_smp_processor_id to asm/smp.h on alpha, m32r,
> > powerpc, s390, sparc, sparc64, and um architectures.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Fernando Luis Vazquez Cao <fernando@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > 
> > diff -urNp linux-2.6.21-rc2/include/asm-alpha/smp.h linux-2.6.21-rc2-hwcpuid/include/asm-alpha/smp.h
> > --- linux-2.6.21-rc2/include/asm-alpha/smp.h	2007-02-05 03:44:54.000000000 +0900
> > +++ linux-2.6.21-rc2-hwcpuid/include/asm-alpha/smp.h	2007-03-07 13:34:14.000000000 +0900
> > @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ int smp_call_function_on_cpu(void (*func
> > 
> >  #else /* CONFIG_SMP */
> > 
> > +#define hard_smp_processor_id()		0
> >  #define smp_call_function_on_cpu(func,info,retry,wait,cpu)    ({ 0; })
> > 
> >  #endif /* CONFIG_SMP */
> 
> /me thinks you should merge this patch with patch 1. Otherwise there is no
> hard_smp_processor_id() defined on any architecture if only patch 1 is
> applied. That would break a git bisect search.
Hi Heiko,

Thank you for reviewing the patch-set. The patches have already been
merged in Andrew's tree but I will take your advice into account when
submitting new patches. I certainly would not like to break bisect
searches.

Fernando

_______________________________________________
fastboot mailing list
fastboot@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.osdl.org/mailman/listinfo/fastboot


[Netdev]     [Linux Wireless]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Security]     [Linux for Hams]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Yosemite]     [Yosemite Forum]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux Admin]     [Samba]     [Linux Media]     [Linux Resources]

Powered by Linux