Re: Photoshp 6 Soft Proofing: Why?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



<x-charset iso-8859-1>And this, I have found after using Photoshop for only several months, is one
of its strong points.

Maris

----- Original Message -----
From: <CDTobie@aol.com>
To: <ftedsen@mac.com>; <epson-inkjet@leben.com>
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:20 AM
Subject: Re: Photoshp 6 Soft Proofing: Why?


|
| In a message dated 9/25/01 10:18:30 PM, ftedsen@mac.com writes:
|
| >But I have to ask the
| >question: why is the soft proofing feature needed?  Doesn't it speak to
| >a
| >failure of color management in the first place?  I thought that the whole
| >idea of profiling was so that we could get consistent colors from
different
| >input, viewing, and output sources.  Should not profiles for different
| >papers and inks provide essentially the same results if the profiles are
| >any
| >good?
|
[snipped]
|
| Its a complicating factor, but I would consider it a feature, not a bug.
<G>
| It would be possible to set up Photoshop so that the default view was a
| proofing window, and all images required an output profile and choices of
| intents to be displayed, but that would be a bit extreme.


-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.

</x-charset>

[Index of Archives]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Scanners]     [Gimp]     [Gimp Users]
  Powered by Linux