|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
> Hi Seth! > > A scan from the neg would be MUCH more accurate. The print has two flaws. Seth, I AM scanning the Negative! 1200 DPI Optical. Agfa T2500 Scanner... > > One thing I WOULD suggest to the photog. The BEST film for that situation is > Fuji 800. Pushed to 1600 is even better. (Do NOT use Fuji 1600). Fuji > reacts to the mixed lighting sources MUCH better than the Kodak stuff. Ah, Thanks. That is the type of info I need! He was using Portra. > > And, yes, there are probably multiple light sources in old bulbs, new bulbs, > different bulb manufacturers, etc. All lighting is brand new. A University alumni donated over a hundred million dollars to build it, and its world class, by far the most beautiful arena I have ever seen anywhere! Floors are marble, there are escalatora, crystal chandeliers, an antique organ, etc. I just hope that the lighting isn't many different kinds, but I think it is. Jerry > - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users