| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
<x-flowed> >[rafe b:] > >I think MIS has a slight edge in gamut over > >Generations. [CD Tobie:] >The 2d and 3d gamut map of these inks (spectro-based) are not identical, but >they are uncannily close! Looking at targets of the two inksets on the same >paper by eye under a proofing light fails to show any distinguishably >different color patches. I'd have to say the gamut issue is a draw. Last I checked, MIS archival inks were a dye-pigment hybrid. Which means that -- by design -- MIS is sacrificing longevity (lightfastness) to improve gamut. So you're saying that this compromise is a failure? I don't have the best eyes on the planet, but my eyes (and memory) seem to disagree with your spectro on this issue. It's been quite a few months, though, since my experiment with MIS-arc inks ended. rafe b. - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. </x-flowed>
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users
|