[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Epson 1200 vs. 1520

To: <epson-inkjet@leben.com>
Subject: Re: Epson 1200 vs. 1520
From: "Mark Dalal" <mfdalal@earthlink.net>
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 07:08:56 -0400
Envelope-to: royce@tssphoto.com
References: <F147zJcZikaTAbNF44V00003412@hotmail.com> <001401c10e81$2dc5eac0$718691c2@t5n9a7> <00a201c10e5c$a7cb8e80$46d4313f@mfdalal> <3B545B16.31B34452@rrv.net> <3B54EFFD.397595C@qwest.net>
Reply-to: epson-inkjet@leben.com
Sender: owner-epson-inkjet@leben.com

<x-charset iso-8859-1>From: James Irelan <ijw1@qwest.net>

> 1270 from Epson for $299, which from virtually all reports is superior to
the
> 1200.

Except that the 1270 can't do Quadtone/Piezography....

Mark

-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.

</x-charset>

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Epson 1200 vs. 1520
  - From: Paul Corsa <nipperdo@earthlink.net>
- Re: Epson 1200 vs. 1520
  - From: James Irelan <ijw1@qwest.net>
- Re: Epson 1200 vs. 1520
  - From: Jerry Olson <jerryolson@rrv.net>

References:
- Epson 1200 vs. 1520
  - From: "Mark Dalal" <mfdalal@hotmail.com>
- Re: Epson 1200 vs. 1520
  - From: "christina marriott" <cmarriott@iol.ie>
- Re: Epson 1200 vs. 1520
  - From: "Mark Dalal" <mfdalal@earthlink.net>
- Re: Epson 1200 vs. 1520
  - From: Jerry Olson <jerryolson@rrv.net>
- Re: Epson 1200 vs. 1520
  - From: James Irelan <ijw1@qwest.net>

Prev by Date: Re: Pizza Wheels, A Different Story
Next by Date: Re: price per foot for archival prints?? was: Re: question about numbered prints
Previous by thread: Re: Epson 1200 vs. 1520
Next by thread: Re: Epson 1200 vs. 1520
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users

Powered by Linux