Jim Yount wrote: > I've done some side-by-side comparisons, and on the two > specific units I checked, the results were much better (sharper) on the > lowly 1640. Others may have different experiences, depending on the > specific units tested. Jim, Did you mean that you compared the 1640 to the 1600? Paul - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.