[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Google
  Web www.spinics.net

Re: Printer DPI vs Resampling



Donald A Schiemann <DSCHIEMANN@prodigy.net> writes on 29 October 2000 at 11:10:48 -0700
 > After scanning with the LS-2000, I adjust the dimensions in PS and then
 > select whatever Resolution maintains the original file size, even if an
 > oddball number like 324.  My rationale is: don't discard any information
 > that the scanner supplied, nor ask for new information through
 > interpolation.  Make sense?

Yes, except it sounds like you're somehow doing this manually.  If you
end up making *small* size adjustments, that's the *worst* case, which
you want to strenuously avoid.  There's a checkbox for whether
resampling takes place; if you uncheck that, then you're safe. 
-- 
David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / dd-b@dd-b.net
Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ 
SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon/
-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.


[Photo]     [Yosemite News]    [Yosemite Photos]    [Scanner]     [Gimp]     [Gimp] Users

Powered by Linux