|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
Donald A Schiemann <DSCHIEMANN@prodigy.net> writes on 29 October 2000 at 11:10:48 -0700 > After scanning with the LS-2000, I adjust the dimensions in PS and then > select whatever Resolution maintains the original file size, even if an > oddball number like 324. My rationale is: don't discard any information > that the scanner supplied, nor ask for new information through > interpolation. Make sense? Yes, except it sounds like you're somehow doing this manually. If you end up making *small* size adjustments, that's the *worst* case, which you want to strenuously avoid. There's a checkbox for whether resampling takes place; if you uncheck that, then you're safe. -- David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / firstname.lastname@example.org Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon/ - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users