| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
<x-charset iso-8859-1>Just ignore this I have been trying to post to the list for days. I have made some mistakes but this one should make it. ----- Original Message ----- From: "rafeb" <rafeb@channel1.com> To: <epson-inkjet@leben.com> Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2000 10:17 AM Subject: Re: Printer DPI vs Resampling > At 08:13 AM 10/28/00 EDT, Joe Mead wrote: > > >I'm looking for opinions (or facts) on which of the following methods will > >result in the best quality print from an Epson printer. > > <snip> > > >It really comes down to resample in Photoshop or let the Epson deal with odd > >ball DPI's. > > > >Any ideas on which would give the best quality print? > > > I see no need to resample for the printer's benefit, > unless I need to up-size the image to print at larger > size. > > Straight off the scanner, my 35 mm negs arrive in > Photoshop at 351 dpi most of the time, and that's > how they get printed on a letter-sized sheet. > > This business about the printer wanting multiples > of 60 (240, 300, 360 dpi) has been brought up before. > It *is* important if you're printing "Black Only" > but from what I've seen, it's not important if > you're printing with all four (or six) colors. > > > rafe b. > > - > Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate > subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. </x-charset>
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users
![]() |