| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Kennedy McEwen <rkm@kennedym.demon.co.uk> writes on 2 October 2000 at 09:14:35 +0100 > In article <20001002024014.1956.qmail@web4106.mail.yahoo.com>, Bob Meyer > <bobm_epson@yahoo.com> writes > >For those of you tired of this, I apologise. For > >those still interested, Byte has an article on the > >problem where they basically swallow the Epson PR > >hook, line and sinker. It's at: > > > >http://www.byte.com/feature/BYT20000926S0001 > > > <snip to what Epson told Byte> > > > >Epson stated to me very clearly that the problem only > >occurs with the Gloss paper, and that the dyes they > >use are the same ones they used in the previous > >printer models. > > If this is true then it reflects extremely bad on both Epson and > Wilhelm! > > If the ink is the same as in previous printers - such as the 1200 - then > they have lied about the changes in formulation required to get the > extended life - and Wilhelm's tests, which show a difference between new > inks and the previous generation, are unreliable at best! You're jumping too far; using the same dyes doesn't mean the overall ink formulation is the same. -- David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / dd-b@dd-b.net Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon/ - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users
|