Re: 1270/870 -- Some remain staunch and steadfast in their denial..

[Bfholi@aol.com]

Keith,

You are a  good man for soliciting list members to spam another member's 
non-commercial e-mail address.  Quibble about the definition of spam if you 
wish, but that _is_ what you are doing in your post.  How admirable your 
intentions are.

--Bruce Holifield


In a message dated 8/26/00 11:11:35 AM, editor@p-o-v-image.com writes:

> [snip]
>I could e-mail every one of the people I have on record who have the shift
>or
>whom have gotten a buyback from EPSON, in part through my intercession,
>to
>simply e-mail [the list member] with a short note telling him  of their
>experience..
>
>By my total, that would be well near 200 e-mails alone..
>
>Of course, he could, like the majority of those at EPSON UK, continue to
>feign
>ignorance and deny the existence of any problem.,..
>
>Ooops, did I "accidentally" Blind CC anyone on this?
>
>[snip]
>
>And feel free to cc: the following two individuals:
>
>Sue Savage <ssavage@epson.co.uk>
>Ed <[epson-inkjet list member's email address]>
>
>
>As they both deny the problem is real..
>
>Hopefully, those of us in the US who have already gotten buybacks or into the
>buyback queue can, in some small way, give the lie to the axiom about 
Americans
>not giving a damn beyond their own pockets... One e-mail with two CC's is not
>too much to hope for, is it?
>
>Remember the best answer to wrong-headed speech in a free society is the 
truth
>in the form of MORE speech..
>
>Keith

-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.