Re: Liquid UV spray?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



At 06:10 PM 07/11/2000 -0700, Mike Greer wrote:
>
>Since many new people have probably joined the list since we last
>debated/argued this point, it has been my experience that top coat sprays
work
>wonders with plain ole non-archival ink. The last time we dealt with this
>issue, I contended that my experience pointed to "environmental" (i.e. non
>light sources) cause for fading because my laminated prints for outlasted my
>non laminated prints when both were exposed to the same ammounts of light.
>While others threw science at me and advised that I read this or that book, I
>contended and still contend that a book isn't going to effect my personal
>experience. That experience was written off as anecdotal at best. 
>

So, what's wrong with "anecdotal"?  A lot of people seem to think that if
something is anecdotal, it can be written off as not true.  An anecdote is
simply a discription of a particular incident and is no more or less true
than more controlled tests.  An anecdote generally means that there are
conditions that can affect the outcome of an action that are not well known
or understood.  This appears to be the case with spraying and lamination.

*****************************
James E. Martz
Milan, OH
jemartz@earthlink.net
*****************************
-
GOSHAWK - Hawk Mtn Art Papers-economical, 100% cotton, coated fine art paper
in sheets & 44" rolls. Ideal for brightly colored fine art reproductions
Free samples (Limit 500) http://www.hawkmtnartpapers.com/goshawk.htm


[Index of Archives]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Scanners]     [Gimp]     [Gimp Users]
  Powered by Linux