Re: Kodachrome 25

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



<x-charset iso-8859-1>Ken,
Interesting, if off topic.  You made me curious - scanned in some Kodachrome
slides taken in 1958 - they still look good.  No way to compare with the
original, but had no problem with my Nikon CoolScan.  Wish I had a website,
I'd share them.  So much to do - so little time!

By the way, I think the Kodachrome I was using in the '50s was 10 ASA,
that's why I sprung for a Voightlander Prominent with a F1.5 lens.

Carr
----- Original Message -----
From: <kenweissblum@mindspring.com>
To: <epson-inkjet@leben.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2000 5:53 PM
Subject: Re: Kodachrome 25


> Is that true for you for Kodachrome 64 also. I have been having
difficulties
> scanning in my Kodachrome with the LS2000. Do you make any adjustments
while
> scanning with it?
>
> Ken Weissblum
> www.metaphotography.com
> kenweissblum@metaphotography.com
>
> > I am using the nikon LS2000 and no problems with kodachrome
> > -
>
>
> -
> Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
> subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.
>

-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.

</x-charset>

[Index of Archives]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Scanners]     [Gimp]     [Gimp Users]
  Powered by Linux