<x-charset iso-8859-1>I have no disagreements with what you have said. I did not even find your previous post disagreeable only limited in applicability. :-) However, in all seriousness, this response is a refreshing golden nugget in what seems to have been a long draught in reasonable, wise, and civil commentary. Thank you. -----Original Message----- From: owner-epson-inkjet@leben.com [mailto:owner-epson-inkjet@leben.com]On Behalf Of chiendh@uci.edu Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 6:40 PM To: epson-inkjet@leben.com Subject: RE: Our responsibilty with Inkjet Printing "Laurie Solomon" wrote: ... Good points! One of the benefits of having this list is that one can come up with good reasons why an initially good idea may not work across the board. Nobody knows all the answers, and it's nice to hear differing viewpoints from everybody -- gives us all broader viewpoints on digital printing. Anyways, it seems whether a print should be permenant for years or not depends on the particular business -- obviously, a business centered around recurring reprint profits would want the shortest lifespan, while the artist would want the longest. d =) - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. - Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions. </x-charset>