RE: Our responsibilty with Inkjet Printing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



<x-charset iso-8859-1>I have no disagreements with what you have said.  I did not even find your
previous post disagreeable only limited in applicability. :-)  However, in
all seriousness, this response is a refreshing golden nugget in what seems
to have been a long draught in reasonable, wise, and civil commentary.

Thank you.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-epson-inkjet@leben.com
[mailto:owner-epson-inkjet@leben.com]On Behalf Of chiendh@uci.edu
Sent: Monday, July 03, 2000 6:40 PM
To: epson-inkjet@leben.com
Subject: RE: Our responsibilty with Inkjet Printing


"Laurie Solomon" wrote:
...

Good points!  One of the benefits of having this list is that one can
come up with good reasons why an initially good idea may not work across
the board.  Nobody knows all the answers, and it's nice to hear
differing viewpoints from everybody -- gives us all broader viewpoints
on digital printing.

Anyways, it seems whether a print should be permenant for years or not
depends on the particular business -- obviously, a business centered
around recurring reprint profits would want the shortest lifespan, while
the artist would want the longest.

d =)


-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.

-
Turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate
subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for list instructions.

</x-charset>

[Index of Archives]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Scanners]     [Gimp]     [Gimp Users]
  Powered by Linux