|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
At 07:08 PM 2/22/00 -0500, John wrote: > I did not compare the Epson  to the Imacon scanner >because it wouldn't be fair - they're not in the same league. I, for one, would be interested in just such a comparison. I don't think fairness has much to do with it; it would help to place the 1600 in terms of its quality. A scan from each at 1600 ppi would be enlightening, especially with additional scans at, say, 800 ppi as a comparison of the base difference between the scanners. If the 1600 was equally distant from the Imacon at both resolutions, the implications would be much different than if the 1600 was much closer to the Imacon at 800ppi than at 1600. Mitch V. __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Talk to your friends online with Yahoo! Messenger. http://im.yahoo.com - Please turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users