|[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]|
David Dyer-Bennet wrote: > > J. Arthur Davis <email@example.com> writes on 17 February 2000 at 20:23:41 -0500 > > > At this point in time digital prints can be far superior to conventional > > photo prints if handled by an expert. The really nice thing about this > > is that they will get even better as technology progresses. > > Furthermore, I believe that this doesn't work only for experts; a > digital duffer seems to produce better prints than a darkroom duffer, > too. At least, *I* produce better digital prints than I ever managed > out of the darkroom. > -- > Photos: http://dd-b.lighthunters.net/ Minicon: http://www.mnstf.org/minicon > Bookworms: http://ouroboros.demesne.com/ SF: http://www.dd-b.net/dd-b > David Dyer-Bennet / Welcome to the future! / firstname.lastname@example.org > - > Please turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use > accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for instructions. And that my friend makes you an expert because you got something better that before. Jim Davis -- _____________________________________________________ J. Arthur Davis -Inkjetstores.com- Serving the world with fine art reproduction services and supplies. Email mailto:email@example.com Web Site http://www.visual-artists.com Get YOUR FREE Marketing Newsletter at http://www.visual-artists.com/ezcontact.html _____________________________________________________ - Please turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users