| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
At 02:30 AM 02/14/2000 -0600, Pam Niedermayer wrote: >Yes, thought about the projectors. Once the technology is >set, once it's possible to print to photographic emulsion, >going larger isn't such a big deal, just more RAM, faster >processor, different lenses. I was thinking of sort of a >reverse scanner process, in which the image would be beamed >via a lens on a stepper motor, or something similar. > Sounds kinda like a description of a laser printer to me with the image drum replaced with a sheet of photographic paper which then gets dunked in the developers, etc. ***************************** James E. Martz Milan, OH jemartz@earthlink.net ***************************** - Please turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users
|