| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
<x-flowed>I would like some advice about (a) scanning larger art (watercolors, etc.) piecemeal on a flatbed versus (b) photographing the art and scanning the film. I had thought I would use an Epson 836XL to scan up to about 12" x 17" art and photograph art that is larger art but still not too big for the 3000. But two 12 x 17 scans could more than cover most of the larger art I would print on the 3000. Wouldn't that be better? If so, what about stitching together four such scans versus photographing even larger art for printing reproductions on a 24" printer? At that point I'd think medium-format photography might become preferable. Sam <samcc@compuserve.com> - Please turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for instructions. </x-flowed>
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users
![]() |