Re: Epson 1600 Scanner

[Pam Niedermayer <pam_pine@cape.com>]

Good morning, Jerry. I intended to say "spi" as samples per
inch rather than DPI. Looks like we're just not living in
the same world. Based on the URL you provided, I reread the
review. I had read it before, just wanted to make sure we
were reading the same review.

Pam

Jerry Olson wrote:
> 
> Not always Pam. A 5 star rating by a leading magazine carries weight. If
> the ads say it is a true 1600x3200 resolution it had better be. If they
> say in the review that the scans are the highest quality of any
> currently available flatbed under $5000, they had better be. Or there
> will be lawsuits. The test I read was not at 300 DPI. I imagine we saw
> different reviews by different people. I wished I would have saved the
> article, but I didn't.
> 
> Pam Niedermayer wrote:
> >
> > Jerry, in this review the test was to scan an 8X10 photo at
> > 300 spi. So it did a great job at 300 spi? I already have a
> > 300 spi scanner that does a fine job at 300 spi. Besides,
> > you should know by now that computer rag reviewers aren't
> > paid enough to do a good job, they simply repeat what's in
> > the product literature.
> >
> > Pam
> >

-- 
Pamela G. Niedermayer
Pinehill Softworks Inc.
1221 S. Congress Ave., #1225
Austin, TX 78704
512-416-1141
512-416-1440 fax
http://www.pinehill.com
-
Please turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use
accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for instructions.