Re: picture resolution

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



<x-flowed>Thanks for the info gary.  I'm going to try this out.  I'll scan a photo at 
400 and then at 200 and print 8x10's from it to compare.   I'm looking 
forward to trying this but unfortunately it'll be several hours before I 
can go home.



At 01:37 AM 1/27/2000 , you wrote:



>If you printed your original 1200 dots in, say, 10" of the 11" page, you
>would be using about 120 of the dots per inch (dpi), which is a bit low,
>although it would probably look fine to a casual viewer.  If you increase
>that to the 2000 dots you described, that would be 200 dots per inch, which
>is a much better resolution and produces a very nice print.  You may even
>get a little more quality by going higher to 240 or 300, but the difference
>wouldn't be as great.  Beyond that, you probably couldn't see any difference
>at all, except the file would be larger.

-
Please turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use
accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for instructions.

</x-flowed>

[Index of Archives]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Scanners]     [Gimp]     [Gimp Users]
  Powered by Linux