I agree, I have been profiling the Generations ink on a 3000 for about a week now with MatchLock (but I'm starting with the Photoquality Inkjet paper since it is less expensive than the Photo paper). Color looks great with RGB profiles and the black looks fine in real images (though you can see it isn't as black as Epson black when you print an artificial step scale -- seems to be just about as black as the MIS black ink though. I'll start on the Epson Photo paper maybe next week. But even better than RGB profiles, I'm also using the new MatchLock CMYK profiler which has full CMYK profile controls including total ink limit, black ink limit, black ink curve, dot gain, and even (here's a nice one) Undercolor Addition. Using undercolor addition you can put as much CMY ink under the black as your paper will hold and get a deep black color, even if your black ink isn't all that intense - more of an issue on watercolor paper than glossy paper. The really great thing about the CMYK profiler is that it almost exactly mimics the standard Photoshop CMYK setup controls but does so with scanner based measurments. For the best of the old world and the new I don't think it can be beat!!! I'll bet even Dan Margulis would like this one (well maybe I'm exagerating a tiny bit on that point). At any rate, anyone who intends to use a CMYK driver like Press Ready or the Sundance R9 might want to spring for the MatchLock CMYK profiler. But before you make up your mind, just delve into the standard CMYK setup controls in Photoshop and tweak a few of the ink limit controls and watch the curves. You can learn a lot about what you can do in CMYK Profiler just by looking at the interactions between the color curve, black curve, and ink limits settings. And it pays to have a bit of experience in using these prior to starting with CMYK Profiler. Roger Smith wrote: snip I purchased the Horses Matchlock Profiler software and I am now in >the process of trying it out. With the first couple of profiles the colors >(on Epson Photo Paper and to a slightly lesser extent on W-V glossy) have >jumped in brilliance and contrast to where they easily match the OEM inks. >I have only tried 5 or 6 images as yet, but so far the results look very >encouraging. Even the much-maligned Generations black seems to be looking >better than before (notwithstanding the previous comments about profiles >not being able to make ink any blacker than it is naturally). I shall >continue my efforts and try some of the other papers. - Please turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for instructions.