| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
Yes, I'm keeping an eye on the 1600, too; but I'm hearing hints that the 1200 may be just as good as the 1600, because, according to 3rd hand info, of the way the CCD's are arrayed. I also have recently read of some testing comparing the 600 spi Epson 636 to the 1200. The results indicate that the 1200 results in only marginally higher resolution scans, not double, not even close. I have a feeling that this is one of those areas where we won't be happy until we break down and spend very serious money on a higher end film scanner of some sort. Pam Mark Hochman wrote: > > Pam, > > For scanning medium and large format I'm seriously considering the new Epson > 1600 scanner. You could easily do 12"x12" print with 6x6 film and probably > twice that as well with little or no loss. Large format you would certainly > be all set. There been a lot of good comments about their older 1200 model. > > I'm waiting to hear from others as soon as they get their Epson scanners and > as soon as I can comeup with a bit more money. :) > -- Pamela G. Niedermayer Pinehill Softworks Inc. 1221 S. Congress Ave., #1225 Austin, TX 78704 512-416-1141 512-416-1440 fax http://www.pinehill.com - Please turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for instructions.
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users
|