| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
<x-flowed>At 08:09 PM 1/23/00 -0400, you wrote: >Archival issues are complicated, and you may want to do some more reading on >the subject. As for actual print quality, the 750 and 1200 (large format >version of the 750) offer the most photographic realism. Having said that, >my wife and her friends notice no difference between my 1200 prints and my >older 600 prints. There is a difference, they just don't know what to look >for. So here is my theory. Thanks for the advice. I have a few prints in my cubicle from my 800 that are still looking very good after being on the wall for almost 2 years! I have had some fade though but only a few. maybe they got more sun?? I've seen some prints from the new HP 1000's and they look more realistic than my 800...so that's why I thought of upgrading but i don't want an HP - Please turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for instructions. </x-flowed>
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users
![]() |