<x-flowed>David Dyer-Bennet > >Just last night I printed an 11x17 on my Epson 1200 for the first >time. I scanned the image from Ektar 25 film on my Nikon Ls-2000, and >I had printed it at 11x17 previously on an HP printer. It looks >pretty darned nice on the Epson, too. > >I know at least one photographer who won't enlarge 35mm above 5x7. I >think that's excessive. I go to 11x14 pretty happily -- but you >definitely see grain sometimes. Doesn't harm most images. Also, >prints above 8x10 are often viewed from farther away than smaller >prints, which helps :-) . > >Now, if only I'd remembered to order 12x18 paper instead; oh well, >only 25 sheets, and I'll correct next time. (Or 13x19, but there >seems to be quite a price break for staying at 12x18 or below!). Which HP do you use? Regards Mike ---------------+--------------- ___ /^^[___ _ N0AGG ICQ# 4471401 /|^+----+ |#___________// Pull Pitch ð ( -+ |____| ______-----+/ Maplewood, MN USA ==_________--' \ ~_|___|__ slickrotorwash@earthlink.net ð Mac OS 9 Powered Rotorcraft <http://home.earthlink.net/~slickrotorwash/>[updated 25 Dec 99] - Please turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for instructions. </x-flowed>