| [Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] |
<x-flowed>>Is Rollataq a viable alternative to 'hot' dry mounting in your opinion? I see >it in magazines, but an art store type poo poo'd it as a permanent mounting >adhesive, so I've yet to try it. I was going to get a bit more experience before posting a message on the Rollataq machine but since someone mentioned it first, I'll jump in. I've had the 36 inch machine up and running for over a month and a half and I've been extremely pleased with it. I too was leery about a liquid adhesive so I bought the hand held unit just to give it a try. It sailed through and Daige offered me a 2 week trial so I went ahead with the larger unit. The system is absolutely low tech: very simple to use and maintain. The coating of glue is uniformly thin. I've been backing up prints off 9000 so I can get a 14 mil two sided image. My final use is to laser cut them so the glue has to be fairly uniform. I was also worried about warping but the prints have been remarkably flat. I have also laminated the Epson paper to a variety of other paper stocks like Japanese kozo fiber paper and 80lb litho stock. Again no problem. Before buying it I had visions of glue seeping all over and leaking out the edges. That isn't the case. The machine just works. I did also buy the pressure rollers and that minimizes some of the warping I'm sure but the primary cause is the very thin, even layer of adhesive. Joe Freedman ps I have worked on Seal and GBC Orca hot laminators--the $20k kind--and I was forever screwing up prints. Tiny bubbles, shiny silvering of the overcoating, ink vaporizing. Yes, I'm sure it was all my fault but the reality is the Daige simply works. - Please turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for instructions. </x-flowed>
[Photo] [Yosemite News] [Yosemite Photos] [Scanner] [Gimp] [Gimp] Users
![]() |