CDTobie@aol.com wrote: > the 4 x 5 film scanned a high rez will not necessarily make > a better print at common sizes (up to 8 by 10) than the 35 mm scan. Boy, when that gets around, that's gonna make an awful lot of jewelry, architecture, and automotive photographers feel real foolish. <g> No kidding...at my first place of employment, the general consensus was that 8x10 film wasn't *quite* large enough to fill a letter page. While I wouldn't go that far, I doubt that either one of us would mistake a 1-2X enlargement of an original for one in the 8-10X range. Steve - Please turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for instructions.