Re: OT: scanning info for list photographers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



CDTobie@aol.com wrote:

> the 4 x 5 film scanned a high rez will not necessarily make
> a better print at common sizes (up to 8 by 10) than the 35 mm scan.

Boy, when that gets around, that's gonna make an awful lot of jewelry,
architecture, and automotive photographers feel real foolish. <g>

No kidding...at my first place of employment, the general consensus was that
8x10 film wasn't *quite* large enough to fill a letter page. While I wouldn't go
that far, I doubt that either one of us would mistake a 1-2X enlargement of an
original for one in the 8-10X range.

Steve



-
Please turn off HTML mail features. Keep quoted material short. Use
accurate subject lines. http://www.leben.com/lists for instructions.


[Index of Archives]     [Yosemite News]     [Yosemite Photos]     [Scanners]     [Gimp]     [Gimp Users]
  Powered by Linux